Define Crossbreeding:
1) You can crossbreed "strains" or "breeds" within the same species. This type of breeding is where you get your widest variety of morphs from. All domestic dogs belong to the Genus/species ~Canis familiarist~, and yet we will all agree that a Standard Poodle and Labrador Retriver hardly look anything alike. They are two different morphs of the same species. You can crossbreed the two to produce a "Labra-doodle," aka a mutt, that is fertile. The way you produce a new "strain" or "breed" is by continuously back-crossing your line until a Labra-doodle bred to a Labra-doodle consistantly produces more Labra-doodles in every sucessive generation.
2) You can crossbreed within a genus two different speices, which usually will give you fertile offspring with a blending of behavior and physical that will either show hybrid vigor, or hybrid supression. This is the most common occurance in the wild, where you get overlapping habitats and species complexes at the fringes. Crossing ~Canis lupis~ (grey wolf) with ~Canis familiarist~ (domestic dog) gives you a "wolf-dog" mutt that is fertile.
3) You can crossbreed two different genuses together within the same family, but the outcome is usually infertile offspring, if the offspring survive at all. That would be like crossing a Red Fox ~Vulpes vulpes~ with a domestic dog ~Canis familiarist~. I don't know if that cross is viable or not. But let's take the Horse/Donkey cross, which most certainly is viable in the form of an infertile mule or hinny. Some "lower" animals, such as fish, amphibians, and reptiles, may actually get viable offspring out such a mating because their genetic code is not as complex as mammalian genetic code.
4) I have never heard of cross-family hybridization. Crossing a member of the Canidea (dog) family with a member of the Felidea (cat) family will not give you a "cat-dog" dispite what the cartoon tells you.
5) There have never been any occurances of cross-phylum hybridization, or cross-class hybridization that I am aware of. Ie, there will never be anything like a "bird-horse" type thing. Unless somehow technology finds a way. Cross-kingdom hybridization would be impossible, but there are a few "human-vegetables" that defy that statement.
A person really can't be against hybridization, because that would mean you'd have to go out into the wild and prevent blue tiger salamanders from breeding with red tiger salamanders to produce a purple color morph tiger salamander where their two particular streams meet. Or you'd have to go and cause the extinction of the whole Empidonax Flycatcher complex (for which many ornithologist would probably thank you for because identifying a true species from all the hybrids is definately the work of a field-pro). HYBRIDIZATION IS A NATURAL PROCESS TOWARDS THE FORMATION OF NEW SPECIES!!!! It is one of the theories of why life on this planet is so damn diverse.
But you can be against human-assisted hybridization if you'd like. Then you'd just be a hypocrite because pratically everything you eat was created by some form of human-assisted hybridization, unless you eat nothing but synthetic food. Then again, synthetic things are created by a hybridization of chemicals under percise human-controlled conditions. The dogs and cats you keep as pets were created from human-assisted hybridization. And of course you couldn't be friends with any mulatto people, or people of Italian-British ethnicity like myself, or any Americans.
~~Colesea