Quarantine dilemma, what would you do?

Lotus

Ultimate Fish
Moderator
Aug 26, 2003
15,115
13
38
Southern California
home.earthlink.net
#1
OK, so the quarantine tank is set up. It's currently seeding with a piece of LR, which will come out before any fish go in. It is barebottom.

Our first planned fish is a sand sifting goby (not sure which, depends on what the store has/can get). I understand they're more prone to ich than some other fish.

My dilemma is whether I should put sand in the quarantine and put the fish in there, or put it the fish straight in the display tank (where there's sand), and remove him if he gets ich (or something else). There are no other fish, so the worst that can happen is that we have to tear the tank down to get him out to treat him.

What would you do?
 

Joe Fish

Superstar Fish
Apr 21, 2006
2,126
1
0
Penn State
josy.isa-geek.com
#2
I would definitely QT the fish first. Most QT as barebottom with some pieces of PVC. Then again, I have also read that you make the QT as close to the display as possible. So my QT tank is a barebottom with some PVC pipe also with some seeded biomedia from my display. I leave my QT running all the time so I don't have to worry about the cycle.
 

Lorna

Elite Fish
Mar 3, 2005
3,082
4
0
NE Indiana
#4
As most sand sifting gobies eat what they sift out of the sand putting a gobie in the qt without any established live sand is probably not recommended as some gobies have tend to starve in qt. Since you don't have any other fish in your main display I don't see what the harm would be in putting him directly into the main tank and then don't add any other animals until the qt time is up.......basically using the main as the qt......if he were to get ich you could then treat the main tank using hypo as you only have the live rock in it ..........
 

Lorna

Elite Fish
Mar 3, 2005
3,082
4
0
NE Indiana
#6
not necessarily.....it would depend though it would be easier to qt and hypo IF necessary rather than risk the gobie starving in qt??? I remember reading quite a bit of pros and cons on qt'ing sifter gobies when I bought mine over a year ago....Though mine eats anything it can fit in its mouth......not a finicky eater at all.....
 

Mahamotorworks

Superstar Fish
Aug 26, 2006
1,722
6
0
Thule, Greenland
www.myspace.com
#8
I think that a fish that starved to death defeats the idea of QT. Here are some Ideas

If the Ich meds wont kill the live rock the just add him to the main tank. The worst that happens is 150 Gallons worth of meds.

You can also add him to the fuge so it is easier to find and check him for Ich.

Add some live sand from the Main tank to the QT tank the when he passes. QT not away. Add the live sand back in to the main tank.

That is all that I can come up with.

MAHA
 

TheFool

Large Fish
Apr 19, 2006
323
2
0
#10
It's for situations like this you might need to consider a 'custom' QT setup that is not barebottom or whatever. The point of QT is that it is not going to be straightforward to treat a tank , even without other fish in it. I have QT'ed some pretty finicky angels in tanks with mucho live rock, because I had to to keep them feeding, but did want to QT them.
If it comes down with ich in the main display it's a mere 6 to 10 week break before you can add anything. If it's velvet, it's tank breakdown time - do you want to risk that?