FroggyFox said:
YES namukoby you're right when you say that another filter will just have more bacteria or that it will "rise to the occasion". The only time a filter WONT work for your tank is if you try to make it do something its not designed for (like a normal UGF in a tank with a sand substrate, or a HOB filter rated for a 5G tank on a 55G tank) Which is why reading up on the different types and sizes of filters is a good thing.
I hope I didn't cause any problems with all of my questions. I feel it is important to be informed, and to understand my options. I actually have done lots of reading, and from what I've seen, there are many viable options for filters - some very versatile, others much better suited to a single purpose. I also believe that reading literature put out by manufacturers only partly answers many questions. That is why I appreciate hearing from those with experience. My husband says I ask too many questions. He's probably right. ;-)
On another note, the Magnum 350 convertible canister we have does not really work. It runs, but there is only a trickle of water coming out. I may be wrong, but a filter rated at 350 gallons per hour should pump water better than that.
In all of the discussion about filters, I'm still wondering if we need more filtration. The XP3 says it is for tanks up to 175g - we are well under that, and if we keep the tank lightly stocked, do regular H2O changes, and clean the filter often, I'm not sure I understand the need for more. Unless it is for back-up purposes, in case something happens to the first.
foty89 said:
Well, sort of. You see, the bacteria are in a sense healthier, but the real reason that it works better is that there is all the surface area for them to colonize and use. So they can grow and reproduce better, so there are simply many times more of them than in a standard filter.
Again, canister filters are great for removing particulate matter, however the bio-wheel is the best for removing biological mater. So the ideal setup would be canister filters and bio-wheels.
Marineland makes a Hot Magnum that is this, however it is not very well reviewed by users. I would see if the second canister you have works, if so I would get the bio-wheel attachments for both and you will have no problems at all with filtration.
Again, canister filters are great for removing particulate matter, however the bio-wheel is the best for removing biological mater. So the ideal setup would be canister filters and bio-wheels.
Marineland makes a Hot Magnum that is this, however it is not very well reviewed by users. I would see if the second canister you have works, if so I would get the bio-wheel attachments for both and you will have no problems at all with filtration.
Thank-you for your patience and willingness to share your expertise with me. That is why I felt this would be a good forum to post on - it's not just a bunch of beginners fumbling around trying to answer each other's questions, like many I've seen.
I'm not convinced I need a biowheel, although it is worth looking into further. I am, however, more convinced that the Filstar is a good filter. If you are right that it is the amount of surface area for the bacteria to grow on, then we made the right choice by adding an excess amount (almost triple the recommended amount) of 'bio-chem stars' in the filter. I am still not convinced that more surface area = more bacteria, however. (Aren't you still limited by the amount of 'food' available to the bacteria?)